Friday, February 12, 2010

Would using true non-volatile memory to stop-gap the clock on portable devices with PC CPU's improve speed?

Could significantly better performance be acheived by not having designed in time-sequence termination, by eliminating a certain malfunction superceding domain? In other words, could CPU designs work that aren't commonly used and the like, and could power savings be achieved by incorporating a simple MRAM or FRAM with last full date, that can only manually be over-ridden by a user who has a previous data/functionality problem?Would using true non-volatile memory to stop-gap the clock on portable devices with PC CPU's improve speed?
Your English is a bit baffling but it appears that you are talking about asynchronous processors. You can get significant power savings that way and asynchronous processors like the ';Amulet'; have proven that it can work.

No comments:

Post a Comment